Testing for Session Fixation (WSTG-SESS-03)
PreviousTesting for Cookies Attributes (WSTG-SESS-02)NextTesting for Exposed Session Variables (WSTG-SESS-04)
Last updated
Last updated
WSTG-SESS-03
Session fixation is enabled by the insecure practice of preserving the same value of the session cookies before and after authentication. This typically happens when session cookies are used to store state information even before login, e.g., to add items to a shopping cart before authenticating for payment.
In the generic exploit of session fixation vulnerabilities, an attacker can obtain a set of session cookies from the target website without first authenticating. The attacker can then force these cookies into the victim's browser using different techniques. If the victim later authenticates at the target website and the cookies are not refreshed upon login, the victim will be identified by the session cookies chosen by the attacker. The attacker is then able to impersonate the victim with these known cookies.
This issue can be fixed by refreshing the session cookies after the authentication process. Alternatively, the attack can be prevented by ensuring the integrity of session cookies. When considering network attackers, i.e., attackers who control the network used by the victim, use full or add the__Host- / __Secure- prefix to the cookie name.
Full HSTS adoption occurs when a host activates HSTS for itself and all its sub-domains. This is described in a paper called Testing for Integrity Flaws in Web Sessions by Stefano Calzavara, Alvise Rabitti, Alessio Ragazzo, and Michele Bugliesi.
Analyze the authentication mechanism and its flow.
Force cookies and assess the impact.
In this section we give an explanation of the testing strategy that will be shown in the next section.
The first step is to make a request to the site to be tested (e.g. www.example.com). If the tester requests the following:
They will obtain the following response:
The application sets a new session identifier, JSESSIONID=0000d8eyYq3L0z2fgq10m4v-rt4:-1, for the client.
Next, if the tester successfully authenticates to the application with the following POST to https://www.example.com/authentication.php:
The tester observes the following response from the server:
As no new cookie has been issued upon a successful authentication, the tester knows that it is possible to perform session hijacking unless the integrity of the session cookie is ensured.
The tester can send a valid session identifier to a user (possibly using a social engineering trick), wait for them to authenticate, and subsequently verify that privileges have been assigned to this cookie.
This testing strategy is targeted at network attackers, hence it only needs to be applied to sites without full HSTS adoption (sites with full HSTS adoption are secure, since all their cookies have integrity). We assume to have two testing accounts on the website under test, one to act as the victim and one to act as the attacker. We simulate a scenario where the attacker forces in the victim's browser all the cookies which are not freshly issued after login and do not have integrity. After the victim's login, the attacker presents the forced cookies to the website to access the victim's account: if they are enough to act on the victim's behalf, session fixation is possible.
Here are the steps for executing this test:
Reach the login page of the website.
Save a snapshot of the cookie jar before logging in, excluding cookies which contain the __Host- or __Secure- prefix in their name.
Login to the website as the victim and reach any page offering a secure function requiring authentication.
Set the cookie jar to the snapshot taken at step 2.
Trigger the secure function identified at step 3.
Observe whether the operation at step 5 has been performed successfully. If so, the attack was successful.
Clear the cookie jar, login as the attacker and reach the page at step 3.
Write in the cookie jar, one by one, the cookies saved at step 2.
Trigger again the secure function identified at step 3.
Clear the cookie jar and login again as the victim.
Observe whether the operation at step 9 has been performed successfully in the victim's account. If so, the attack was successful; otherwise, the site is secure against session fixation.
We recommend using two different machines or browsers for the victim and the attacker. This allows you to decrease the number of false positives if the web application does fingerprinting to verify access enabled from a given cookie. A shorter but less precise variant of the testing strategy only requires one testing account. It follows the same steps, but it halts at step 6.
Implement a session token renewal after a user successfully authenticates.
The application should always first invalidate the existing session ID before authenticating a user, and if the authentication is successful, provide another session ID.